A connected workflow
Evaluate what happens from examination preparation through monitoring, marking and controlled result release.
Already using another CBT application?
Compare the whole examination process.
A sound CBT decision considers more than the student question screen. Review security, preparation, control, recovery, marking, results, deployment, training and support.
Five areas worth testing in every demo.
Security and access control
Review student eligibility, centrally enforced timing, randomised papers, live monitoring, activity records and recovery of saved answers.
Operational continuity
Ask how saved answers recover after a refresh or brief interruption and what the school team can see during an examination.
Human control
Confirm who publishes examinations, approves official theory marks and decides when results become visible.
A realistic deployment plan
Assess the school server, local network, devices and backup power against the expected number of concurrent candidates.
The Testify advantage
Purpose-built examination infrastructure.
Testify is built around secure role separation and the work schools perform before, during and after examinations, with human decisions preserved where they matter.
- A purpose-built platform for school examination workflows.
- One role-based workflow from preparation and approval to marking and release.
- Role-based access separates administrator, teacher and student responsibilities.
- Schools can configure Testify’s application colours and visual theme to reflect their identity.
- Local school-network deployment for school computer laboratories.
- No per-student licence cap; capacity depends on the school’s infrastructure.
- One staff training session and support are included.
Questions to ask every CBT provider.
Does the platform manage the workflow before, during and after the examination?
Can teachers handle objective and theory questions in one controlled process?
Can authorised staff see candidate progress and review examination activity?
Can saved work recover after a refresh or brief interruption?
Who decides when results are ready to be released?
Can the platform control student eligibility and timing, randomise papers, monitor live attempts and preserve activity evidence?
Can the application reflect the school’s colours and visual identity?
What training and support will the school receive?
Evaluate Testify against your school’s priorities.
A focused demonstration can cover the workflow, infrastructure and controls your decision-making team needs to review.